Mike Beversluis

Sunday, October 11, 2009

Nuts and bolts


I've really enjoyed Dan Edmunds's posts on car and truck suspensions.  They are the raw bits of gear head gnarliness.  Check out the new Ford SVT Raptor, which is an absolute monster - as you'll see at the end, those tires & wheels weigh in at nearly a hundred pounds each. Yikes.  If citified driving is more your style, take a look at the BMW M3Nissan GT-RDodge Challenger R/T (with Nivomats!), Ford Focus SES, or the Hyundai Genesis Coupe.

I've also picked up a copy of Allan Staniforth's Competition Car Suspension, and soon I'll be able to spot an improperly adjusted coil-over damper at fifty paces.  This is partly motivated by curiosity and partly because I'd like to upgrade the springs and dampers on my own car, which lists sharply to the leeward in a curve and understears like there's no tommorrow, and not achieve the usual perversion of spending a lot of money to look-fast-but-drive-worse-and-slower aftermarket dumbness.

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 25, 2008

2008 DC Auto Show


I went to the DC Auto Show today, which was fun. They did not have the new ZR-1, or the new Camaro or Challenger, but still, it's fun to go sit in cars (that's the wheel of the gonzo RS4 convertable above).



The Mustang Shelby KR-500, coming to a Barret-Jackson near you.


The new M3 hotness, for the spiky-haired Maxim reader.



Vintage Racing Volvo!


Ford GT hotness.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Free energy for everyone!

I'm pissing into the wind here, but let me note that mandating 35 mpg fleet averages could increase the total amount of gasoline burned per person because it could increase the car's marginal utility. (I think I know what those words mean) [previously]

Maybe we've already saturated that effect, although I might start towing an extra car to work, just in case the first one breaks. Either way, I doubt the energy policy will have the intended consequences. It most definitely will have unintended consequences.

Labels: , ,

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Ferrambo




Labels: ,

Monday, February 19, 2007

The Iron Law of Unintended Consequences


Sticker Shock: A California program to encourage hybrid cars has some unexpected consequences.
BY RICHARD B. MCKENZIE

IRVINE, Calif.--In 2006, the California legislature authorized the state Department of Motor Vehicles to distribute 85,000 stickers to the owners of gasoline-electric hybrid cars. The stickers allow drivers to travel without passengers in all of the state's high occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, which were formerly restricted to cars with two or more passengers. A report determined that California's HOV lanes were operating only at two-thirds of their capacity and not easing congestion as much as they could; the idea was to stimulate demand for hybrids and thus reduce the emissions of greenhouse pollutants.

The sticker distribution did exactly what it was supposed to do. People wanted to shave time off their commute, and the stickers drove up demand for hybrids for the Toyota Prius and Honda Civic hybrid (the only cars that qualified for stickers), so much so that the small Prius has been selling for over $30,000, and until recently had waiting lists. The Civic hybrid has carried a dealer "added premium" to the manufacturer's suggested list price of as much as $4,000 (with the hybrid Civic total price nearly $7,500 higher than the quoted price of a non-hybrid Civic).

But it seems that the hybrid HOV program, rather than suppressing automobile use, did the exact opposite: The program was wildly popular, and the HOV lanes became clogged. Californians began talking about "Prius backlash."

Then at the end of January, the DMV ran out of stickers, leaving more than 800 new Prius and Civic hybrid owners, who may have been enticed to buy their hybrids at premium prices inflated by sticker advantage and who applied for the stickers, without the right to drive alone in the state's HOV lanes.

The energy use of cars isn't so much the problem as the congestion, but whatever solution gets implemented, the unintended consequences will be larger than the intended ones. My own plan is to try and live in flyover country, but we'll see how well that works out. Here are Philip Greenspun's thoughts on Boston congestion fees (along with interesting comments).

NB: From DCist:

Is This Heaven? No, Its Ballston!:
On Sunday, the Post examined the strategy of Tysons planners who see Arlington's section of Orange Line as the paradigm for mixed use, pedestrian-friendly development. While the booming success of the corridor is impressive, critics of the plan find comparisons unconvincing, noting the extreme imbalance of offices and housing in Tysons and relative distance from the regional hub in D.C. The Post does not detail the alternate proposal backed by many growth opponents of sticking your head in the sand and hoping the congestion just goes away.

Labels:

Saturday, February 17, 2007

Good vs Evil... What side... You On?



A World Map of Driving Orientation
, which I take it, is different than the world map of driver's orientations (cough, people in the Southern Hemisphere drive around upside down). Which reminds me of a pet peeve - space ships in movies always meet oriented in the same direction.

Anyway, Strange Maps is nifty.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Hoons

Now if you will excuse me, I am going to go drink some milk that's three days past its sell-by date.

Labels: , , ,

Sunday, January 28, 2007

Myths?

5 Myths About Suburbia and Our Car Culture, By Ted Balaker and Sam Staley, Washington Post.

1. Americans are addicted to driving.
2. Public transit can reduce traffic congestion.

Interesting.

Labels: , ,

TurboBricks


Sorry for the obsession, but someday my hotrod Volvo fever-dream will come true: TurboBricks.

Labels: , , ,

Thursday, January 25, 2007

Speaking of turbos



Once my long-term financial plan to win the lottery comes through, I would happily cut a check for Troy's 1400 HP Wonderboy. Because of the efficiency.

Labels: ,

Radicharger!

I was thinking about that geothermal idea today and, as always, about turbochargers. Not about turbonique, but still - something, anything to help to provide irresistible force to my movable mass.

When you burn fuel in your car, a third of the energy goes to turning the crankshaft, another third goes to heat the cylinder walls and head and the remainder shoots out the tailpipe. Turbos are great because they recover part of the exhaust's heat-energy and return it to the crank-shaft. As the hot gas goes past the turbine blades it expands and cools, and this energy is used to pump air on the compressor side into the engine. Which allows the engine to operate as if atmospheric pressure was 28 psi (or whatever), which makes it more efficient and powerful. If the turbocharged engine is cheap enough, durable enough, and well-designed to provide decent throttle response, it is smaller and more fuel-efficient that thee lowly non-turbocharged engine of the same power. Turbos have dominated racing whenever they are allowed, partly because cheap and durable aren't big factors.

But what I wondered about was the energy going out into the atmosphere via the radiator. If I run around at wide-open throttle (like I do all the time), that means I'm putting 200 hp into just heating the great outdoors via hot water.

However, if you had a hybrid car - you could extract this energy via a Sterling engine and store it electrically. The heat buildup is slow, so I don't see how you could make a direct mechanical feedback like a turbocharger does, but if you already have electric motors hanging off the drive train, why not? The key is to be able to efficiently extract power with 200 degree F water - just like geothermal power. At the very least it should work well for large diesel-electric trains and busses.

Labels: , ,

Monday, January 22, 2007

The Great Leap Forward


Finally, a solution to free ourselves from gridlock and long commutes to anti-social cookie-cutter suburban McMansion enclaves: Personal trains for everyone. All we need to do is put in railways to all homes and businesses.

Labels: , ,

Friday, January 05, 2007

NIB Volvo


My brother in law the mechanic thinks my penchant for hotrod volvos is beyond the pale. Sheer lunacy and the mark of a terminal goof. So be it: eBay Find of the Day: "New" '73 Volvo. Check out those tailpipes.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, December 05, 2006

More Hot Volvo Action


Reader Ride of the Day: Supercharged Volvo 1800E

More: The Volvette: TT LS1-powered 740 Wagon

Previously: 600-hp RetroVolvo

Labels: ,

Sunday, November 05, 2006

Chinese Driving Exam

Driving Them Crazy [By Elizabeth Williamson, Washington Post Staff Writer]


You are motoring down a stretch of Chinese highway outside Chengdu, when, glancing at the side-view mirror of your Xiali 2000, you notice flames shooting from your gas tank.

Quick -- do you:
a. Strip off your cotton clothing and use it to smother the flames.
b. Toss water on the blaze.
c. Dig out your trusty carbon-dioxide fire extinguisher.
d. Call the U.S. Embassy for help.

The answer is definitely not (d). Only a handful of the hundreds of U.S. diplomats posted in China, we're told, (and none in the Chengdu consulate) have passed the Chinese driving exam, from which the slightly-modified question above is drawn. The "correct" answer, by the way, is (a).

[...]

Jian Huali, first secretary at the Chinese Embassy, had no pity for our sweat-hog foreign service officers. "You think this is funny? I don't think they are studying," he said. "Washington has a half-million people. Beijing has 3 million cars. . . . We need people to be more aware of what they are doing on the street.

"Ninety-five percent of Chinese can pass the test. I passed with only one question wrong."

Well. It seemed only fair to test Jian Huali with three sample questions. Wrong, wrong and wrong.

"If you asked me in Chinese, I could do better," he said. "Also, I haven't been in China for four years. . . . The traffic regulations change every day."

Then he asked: "Are you going to put my name in the paper and say I have gotten three questions wrong?"

Check out the article for a bunch more questions. Via Book of Joe.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

I am in love

Unleash the inner Swedish-bikini-team model and my Volvo crush goes to 11:





For those so inclined, check out these C30's: One, Two, Three.


I said that I wanted to own a Volvo someday and that this didn't make sense, but now if feels like the nerdy girl just took off her glasses and let down her hair, and Voila! she's totally hot.

Labels: ,

Friday, July 28, 2006

I'll see your Mach V and raise you Elvis from the Future


I've been going mano a mano with my Brother in Law over dream cars, and I'd like to make my latest salvo public.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 17, 2006

Speed Limits

Interesting. As cars improve people adjust their behavior to maintain the same risk. The 55 mph limit on 270 is ridiculous, and is only there because the PoPo go bounty hunting each 29th/30th/31st.

Labels:

Wednesday, May 03, 2006

Wireless Car thieves

Well, this sucks. "Security through obscurity" doesn't last long if someone decides you're not obscure any more*. If your hoopty is worth something to you, or more pertinently, to someone else, you might consider an anti-theft device like this. Apparently it works.

*Note to Apple guys - virii are coming your way.

Labels:

Wednesday, April 12, 2006

Turbonique


Labels: , ,