I'm not going to follow this train of thought too far, but it's clear that I instill a desire in people around me to tell me all about all of the things I'm doing wrong. I have a "Mentor Me" sticker on my back. Number one with a bullet is that I'm arrogant, e.g., my sister will tell me, "You're so arrogant." Or friends will say, "Hey, pass the salt, and by the way, you're an egomaniac."
But let's ignore them talking about me for the moment and let me talk about other people. Which I guess is arrogant - Perfect! Arrogance is a widespread character trait among my colleagues. So why do so many scientists, and in particular, physicists think so highly of themselves? It may seem counter-intuitive, but let me suggest that it's because we fail at almost everything we try, almost all of the time.
By "almost all the time," I mean 99% of the time. If this sound like an exaggeration, consider this: If their graduate work ever comes up, and somehow it always does, experimentalists will tell you that out of their 6 years toil in grad school (or whatever), all of the data for their thesis dissertation was collected in a week or two. Every single one of them will say this.
Granted, the work accomplished in this
golden moment usually depended on much of the prior work, at least for knowledge about what experiments don't work. So allow me some hemming and hawing room there. Plus, they always say this with a wry look of nostalgia in their eye, so part of its bragging about... I'm not sure quite what, but besides that, what they say implies that, over the course of six years, the total profitable time spent in the lab was about a week. That's ~1 day per year, ~0.274% of the total time, or 0.4% of the working year. So actually, stipulating a 1% success rate is a somewhat Polyanna viewpoint.
This is a phenomenal amount of failing to endure. Many times a lot of work can go into a project, only to have it totally abandoned after 3 or 6 months. Because of this constant experience of walking uphill into a sideways blowing sleet and shoveling coal with your bare hands after your father shoots you to wake you up at 3 in the morning after you worked until 4, it's really helpful to have a unshakable certainty that you're headed towards a worthwhile destination.
Getting there is besides the point, because you always immediately start on towards the next project. Really there's never this moment of exultation. Just feed another log into the fire, another car into the crusher, etc. Lest I sound self-pitying, I'm not - it's just seems like a plausible explanation for where I've ended up and how I'm like those already there. The process is self-selecting, and so it tends to concentrate the field around these sorts of people.
Labels: advice, graduate school